Juggling with Heidegger

by

***WARNING: RISQUE.  CONTINUE AT YOUR OWN RISK***

I thought it would be amusing to take Heidegger’s jug on a stroll around the Intraweb (that’s what my mom calls it) and see what interesting developments came of it.

So to begin with, Heidegger notes that “Near to us are what we usually call things.” From this, I believe we are to understand that a jug is near at hand because we are told “The jug is a thing.” So let us find a jug near at hand.

girlsjugs

But a jug is not merely a thing near at hand, it also, as we are told, able to hold something else in it and is, therefore, a vessel.

holdabeer02os5

Not only is it a vessel, Heidegger points out, it is a vessel capable of standing on its own.

womanjugs1

But a jug is also made.  Part of its jugness is its manufacture.  I would place another image, but I think the previous one will suffice (unless you are under the delusion the previous jugs aren’t made….come on).

To continue, Heidegger realizes that the emptiness is what does the jugs holding.  In this case, cleavage fits the bill I think.

cleavage

There is also a giving component to jugs.  That is, they take as well as keep and as such part of their jugness is their ability to gift.

boobs-as-gifts

Finally, Heidegger comes to the conclusion that jugs have their own thingness outside of man.  Jugs jug. Jugs jug jugs.

bobmousepadsboobstressjugsofjugs

One Response to “Juggling with Heidegger”

  1. M Says:

    Where did you find the fourth picture? It’s hot.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: